Skip to main content

When You Look in the Mirror and See Your Father

 


Reflections on The Father Question

This article was inspired by Episode 2 of The Men's Group Debate Series, held on June 6, 2026, at Savelberg Retreat Center in Nairobi, under the theme "The Men Nairobi Raised Are Not the Men Nairobi Needs." The debate, moderated by Erick Opon and featuring contributions from Justus Kirigua, Titus Lwanda, Steve Wasilwa, and Collins Munene, explored five provocative questions on success, fatherhood, provision, emotional health, and identity. What follows is not a transcript of the debate but a reflection on the ideas, stories, and tensions that emerged as a room full of men wrestled with what it means to become whole.

---

One of the strangest experiences of adulthood is hearing your father's voice come out of your mouth.

The first time it happens is unsettling. You are usually in the middle of a conversation, an argument, or giving advice nobody asked for. Then suddenly you hear it — a phrase, a tone, an expression. For a brief moment, you stop speaking and think: "Good Lord. I have become my father."

This can be either comforting or terrifying, depending on your father. For some men, it is a moment of pride. For others, it feels like discovering a hereditary condition. Yet almost all of us experience it eventually. Whether we realize it or not, our fathers continue traveling with us long after they leave the room — sometimes through wisdom, sometimes through wounds, sometimes through habits, sometimes through silence, sometimes through strengths, sometimes through fears.

Which is why one of the most fascinating motions in The Men's Group Debate Series asked a question that appeared simple but was anything but: Are we unconsciously becoming our fathers?

The room immediately grasped the weight of the question. Nobody arrives at adulthood empty-handed. We all inherit something. The real question is what we inherit.

What Have You Inherited?

As I listened to the debate, I realized the motion was not really about fathers. It was about inheritance. And inheritance is much bigger than money.

We inherit beliefs, assumptions, fears, communication styles, and emotional habits. We inherit definitions of success, ways of handling conflict, and ideas about marriage, masculinity, leadership, God, and ourselves. Some inherit confidence. Others inherit anxiety. Some inherit courage. Others inherit silence. Some inherit emotional warmth. Others inherit emotional distance. Most of us inherit a mixture.

Which is why the debate felt so personal. Nobody was discussing a theory. They were discussing the people who raised them — the people who shaped them, the people whose fingerprints still exist on their lives. Whether they like it or not.

Justus and the Story We Inherit About Ourselves

When Justus spoke, I found myself thinking less about fathers and more about identity, because one of the stories he shared touched something deeper than achievement. It touched narrative — the stories we inherit about who we are and who we are not.

Many of us receive these stories long before we can evaluate them. You're not academic. You're too emotional. You're not leadership material. You're difficult. You're lazy. You're weak. You're not enough. The remarkable thing is that many people spend decades living inside stories they never consciously chose.

Listening to Justus reminded me how powerful inherited narratives can be. Not because they are true, but because they are repeated. Repeated stories become beliefs. Repeated beliefs become identity. Repeated identity becomes behavior. And before long, a man finds himself living inside a script he never wrote.

This is one reason I appreciate Mark Wolynn's work in It Didn't Start With You. His central insight is both hopeful and unsettling — many patterns did not begin with us—the fear, the avoidance, the silence, the scarcity, the shame, the beliefs. Sometimes we carry stories older than we realize. This means self-awareness is not simply discovering who we are. It is also about discovering what we inherited.

Steve and the Case for Honor

Steve approached the motion differently. Listening to him, I got the sense that he was trying to rescue something modern conversations occasionally lose — gratitude, honor, and perspective — because discussions about fathers can quickly devolve into fault-finding. And to be fair, most fathers made mistakes. Some made many. Yet Steve seemed determined to remind the room of another truth: most fathers were also carrying burdens we rarely see.

Many were trying to provide with limited resources, to lead with limited examples, to parent with wounds they had never healed, and to raise children while still figuring themselves out. Richard Rohr writes extensively about masculine development, and one of his observations is that many men spend large portions of their lives surviving rather than becoming — working, providing, carrying, enduring. Not because they are thriving, but because responsibility demands it.

As Steve spoke, I found myself wondering how often sons judge their fathers based on information their fathers never had access to. The father who struggled to express affection. The father who rarely spoke about emotions. The father who worked constantly. The father who seemed distant. Perhaps some of these fathers were not withholding. Perhaps they were simply passing on the only model they had.

This does not excuse everything, but it does create compassion. And compassion is often where healing begins.

Titus and the Inheritance We Must Examine

Then Titus shifted the conversation, as he often did throughout the debate. His contribution felt less like an argument and more like an invitation — an invitation to examine, question, and reflect. Not everything we inherit should be automatically preserved.

Some inherit courage — keep it. Some inherit discipline — keep it. Some inherit integrity, faith, and generosity — keep them all. But what about inherited anger? Inherited avoidance? Inherited emotional distance? Inherited silence? Inherited fear? Inherited control?

Titus seemed to be asking a difficult question: what happens when the very thing that helped one generation survive becomes the thing that limits the next? That question sat heavily in the room. Every man recognized something — there are parts of our fathers we admire, and parts we promised ourselves we would never become. Then adulthood arrives, and we discover both are living inside us, which is considerably less convenient than it sounds.

Collins and the Men Who Break the Cycle

Then Collins brought the conversation to a place every generation eventually arrives at. Responsibility. Not responsibility for what happened to us. Responsibility for what happens next.

Listening to him, I found myself thinking about how easily an entire lifetime can be spent explaining ourselves through our fathers. And to be fair, there is often good reason. Some men grew up with fathers who were present. Others grew up with fathers who were absent. Some inherited encouragement. Others inherited criticism. Some inherited emotional safety. Others inherited unpredictability. Some inherited wisdom. Others inherited wounds.

Yet Collins seemed to push the room toward a harder question. Not "What happened to you?" but "What are you going to do with it?" Eventually, every man reaches an age when blaming his father becomes less useful than understanding him. And understanding him becomes less important than deciding who he will become.

There is something profoundly liberating about that realization. You may not have chosen your inheritance, but you can choose what happens next. You can choose what continues. You can choose what improves. You can choose what ends. And perhaps that is where fatherhood truly begins — not when a man has children, but when he consciously decides what legacy he will carry forward and what legacy will end with him.

Murray Bowen and the Family River

One of the most useful ideas in family systems theory comes from Murray Bowen. Bowen suggested that families behave less like collections of individuals and more like rivers — what happens upstream eventually appears downstream. Patterns travel. Anxiety travels. Communication styles travel. Conflict patterns travel. Emotional habits travel. Strengths travel. So do weaknesses.

When I first encountered Bowen's work, it explained something I had repeatedly seen in coaching. A man swears he will never become like his father. Twenty years later, he discovers he has inherited his father's conflict style, silence, or emotional distance. Not because he wanted to, but because patterns travel more easily than intentions.

Families are remarkably effective at transmitting behavior. This means the question is never whether something is being passed on — something always is. The question is whether we are aware of it. And awareness is where transformation begins.

Carl Jung and the Father Inside the Son

Jung would probably smile at this point in the conversation, having spent much of his life exploring the hidden forces that shape human behavior. If Jung had attended the debate, I suspect he would have asked a question nobody wanted to answer: "What parts of your father live inside you?"

It is a deeply uncomfortable question. Most men can immediately identify their father's flaws, but far fewer can recognize where those same tendencies appear in themselves. One day you are criticizing your father's communication style. Three years later, you hear yourself speaking to your teenager and realize you have become a limited-edition reissue of the very man you were criticizing. Life has a sense of humor that way.

Jung believed that maturity requires integration — the ability to honestly see what is within us: the strengths, the weaknesses, the gifts, the wounds. Not so we can condemn ourselves, but so we can become conscious, because unconscious patterns tend to control our lives. Conscious patterns can be transformed.

Perhaps this is one of the greatest gifts a man can give himself — the courage to stop saying "My father was like this" and to start asking "How much of that lives in me?"

James Hollis and the Father Wound

James Hollis explores a painful reality many men quietly carry. The father wound. Not necessarily abuse. Not necessarily abandonment. Sometimes, it is simply absence — emotional absence, relational absence, or developmental absence. The father was there. Yet somehow not there.

Many men struggle to describe it. They had a father, yet still feel fatherless in certain areas of life — no guidance, no initiation, no emotional connection, no affirmation, no model for becoming a man. The challenge is that unresolved father wounds rarely stay confined to childhood. They often surface in adulthood — in relationships, in leadership, in identity, in confidence, in conflict. Sometimes men spend decades trying to earn approval from fathers who stopped speaking years ago. Sometimes they spend decades trying to prove something to fathers who never asked for proof.

This is why compassion matters. Not because our fathers were perfect, but because they were human. And because healing often begins when we stop asking our fathers to become who they never learned to be.

Bowlby and the Gift of Presence

John Bowlby's work on attachment adds another layer to the discussion. Attachment is not built primarily through advice, correction, or instruction. It is built through presence. A child develops confidence not because someone explains it, but because someone consistently shows up. Presence creates safety. Safety creates exploration. Exploration creates growth.

And perhaps this is one of the hidden lessons many fathers discover too late — children rarely need perfect fathers. They need available ones. The memory that shapes a child is often surprisingly ordinary: the conversation, the walk, the encouragement, the laughter, the attention. The moments that seem insignificant as they happen become unforgettable later.

Frankl and the Transformation of Inheritance

At this point, Viktor Frankl quietly enters the room. Frankl always asks the same question: What meaning will you make from this?

Not "What happened?" but "What will you do with what happened?" Two men can inherit the same wound — one becomes trapped by it, the other transformed by it. Two men can inherit the same hardship — one repeats it, the other redeems it.

Frankl's genius was helping people see that meaning creates freedom. Not freedom from the past, but freedom in relation to it. The past may explain us, but it does not have to define us. That may be one of the most hopeful ideas in the entire debate.

The Inheritance Audit

This is where coaching enters the conversation. Awareness without action changes very little. Over the years, I have found one exercise particularly useful. I call it the Inheritance Audit — three simple questions every man can sit with honestly.

The first question: what did I inherit that I should keep? The discipline, the courage, the work ethic, the faith, the generosity, the resilience. Every father gives gifts. Our responsibility is to recognize them rather than lose them in the process of examining his failures.

The second question: what did I inherit that I should improve? Perhaps communication. Perhaps emotional awareness. Perhaps balance. Perhaps presence. Not everything needs rejection — some things simply need upgrading. The raw material was good. The application needs refinement.

The third question: what did I inherit that should end with me? The anger, the silence, the shame, the addiction, the fear, the emotional distance. The patterns that no longer serve the next generation. Every man eventually becomes a bridge. The question is what crosses it.

The Blessing We Leave Behind

After the debate, one thought stayed with me. Fathers are constantly passing things on — sometimes intentionally, sometimes accidentally. A child is always learning, watching, absorbing, interpreting, and receiving. The inheritance is happening whether we notice it or not.

That means the question is not whether you will leave a legacy. You already are. The real question is what kind.

One day, someone will sit across from your son or your daughter and ask them about you. Not your income. Not your title. Not your net worth. You. What story will they tell? Will they speak of fear or courage? Distance or presence? Pressure or wisdom? Will they inherit your wounds or your healing? Your limitations or your growth?

Perhaps that is the deepest lesson hidden within The Father Question. Most fathers gave us something. Vs Most fathers failed to give us something. Maturity is learning to honor both truths — to receive the gift, to understand the wound, to extend compassion, and then to choose consciously what happens next.

Every generation receives an inheritance, but every generation also becomes one.

And sooner or later, every man must answer the same question:

What have you inherited — and what are you passing on?

If this message stirred something in you, don’t let it fade.

1.       Join my LinkedIn Habit Coaching Newsletter: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/habits-with-coach-edwin-7399067976420966400/

2.       Join my Habit WhatsApp Community at https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbAmKkOBvvsWOuBx5g3L  

3.       Ready to level up your life? Join my 12-Month Personal Transformation Program and let’s intentionally build the next version of you — with clarity, discipline, and momentum. Call or WhatsApp me directly at +254 724 328059, and let’s begin.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Money is Spiritual

Jesus had been in the desert for 40 days and 40 nights. The limitations of the body were evident. He was alarmingly hungry. This body he had was flawed; he needed to eat something after forty days of being in his thoughts, emotions, and the frailty of the human body. Just as he was about to step past the fortieth day, the devil appeared. I am not sure if Jesus would have done more days, but what we know is that the devil appeared at the right time and tested if Jesus would immediately gratify his hunger pangs. “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.” ‘If’ is a strong doubt creator. If you are an exceptional accountant, if you are a gifted singer, if you are a talented speaker. This tags at our desire to be seen, appreciated, and acknowledged as unique and special. Doubt has always been the devil’s tool of choice. If you don’t know who you are, you will do everything to get others to tell you who you are. Satan had always wanted to be superior t...

How to Thrive in a Toxic Environment

Imagine travelling to a new land that promises to make your dreams come true. You arrive there, and at first, you are overjoyed as you imagine a bright future. But as the days go by, you realize that you can’t make friends. The people there ostracize you and call you names. And the opportunities afforded to you are minimal. The question is, will you shut down and go back to where you came from? Oh! And by the way, where you came from, there is a famine, and people are dying. What do you do? This is the issue that faced the Thai-Chinese population when they first settled in Thailand. Their story of resilience and industry is what I want to begin with. In the late 1800s and early 1900s, a wave of Chinese migrants from southern China arrived in Siam (modern-day Thailand) seeking better lives. They started at the bottom as laborers, traders, and small shopkeepers, precisely because no other jobs were available. They endured poverty, discrimination, and were viewed as second-class cit...

I Am Enough

By the time Alexander the Great died at 32 years old, he had created one of the largest empires in history, stretching from Greece to northwestern India. Some say he died from a drunken stupor, some say from disease, and most say from poisoning. Alexander had never been defeated in war; he was an unstoppable force, and whatever he set his sights on became his. Considered one of history's greatest military strategists and commanders, Alexander spent his last days in a drunken stupor.  Frustrated by sickness and the sting of mortality. Alexander was beloved, yet his demise brought relief to his soldiers and generals, who had endured the ravenous desire of a young man to conquer the world. At first, his men had followed, his charisma and leadership sufficient. But as they did the impossible and their numbers started dwindling, the slaughter, mayhem, and extensive plunder became meaningless. They wanted out. One of his generals pleaded with him to change his opinion and return; the men...